service apartment 擁有者可唔可以買夾屋?

unicorn

上星期我同幾位業主吹水食飯
佢地r晒頭我地rc究竟當唔當係住宅?
最後好似有幾個業主轟炸了房協一輪
之後房協reply叫我地睇返自己份地契
以我自己為例, 份地契收口係保險箱搵都要搵好耐

有冇版友可以scan "permitted land use"戈一項上黎俾我check check?
或者有冇版可以分享下你地同居屋/公屋/房協/房處deal既情況?

其實單以今次夾屋為例
2公婆搵39000幾唔係人人都"多過"
而總資產有一間rc但按7成都只係6-70萬身家
我地好易"附合"標準

unicorn

http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/199909/21/0921189.htm
我順手post埋"當年"政府對service apartment既立場

Under the revised Guidelines, the definition of Service Apartment (SA) is refined to mean an establishment held under central management to provide residential accommodation with central air-conditioning.

It is characterized by fully/partly-furnished studio or two-room unit with a small pantry/kitchenette, or a high proportion of such units in the same building or establishment, and provided with communal facilities, such as dining hall, laundry, recreational facilities and housekeeping services.

"In other words, SA refers to the type of residential accommodation that operates like a hotel establishment. Other types of service apartment developments that resemble residential flats will be considered as flats and subject to the provisions for 'Flat' use under the relevant Outline Zoning Plans," a spokesman for the Board said.

The development of "hotel-like" SA will continue to be permitted as of right in "Commercial" and "Commercial/Residential" zones, and may be permitted on application to the TPB in other zones.

To reflect the characteristics of "hotel-like" SA, it is stated in the revised Guidelines that it should normally comprise not less than 75 per cent of relatively small units, i.e. studio or two-room units of reasonable sizes, say, in the region of 40 square meters and 70 square meters respectively.

unicorn

我自已覺得rc係如假包換"最標準service apartment"
所以佢個地契寫
"Commercial" and "Commercial/Residential" 就最公平
如果強姦我地係Residential就好唔口岩  

unicorn

如果今次check到有rc都可以買居屋
"可能"rc會成為搶手貨