唯恐天下不亂者，小人也。 :em05:作者: 5th Element 時間: 2004-8-18 02:26:14
RV thanks for your effort. 作者: lbkoala 時間: 2004-8-18 03:35:12
村長，謝謝您為大家出了這麼多信和出力～作者: Wing and Eva 時間: 2004-8-18 10:06:04
RV Thanks!!
Really don't know what is their daily work. Everything need provide evidence by ourself. They should think all of the RC's residents are the policeman ICAC............作者: RamblerVillager 時間: 2004-9-2 20:33:43
藍澄灣有人做工業?作者: fkf 時間: 2004-9-3 11:52:41
...Under this policy RBS is classified as a non-franchised bus service with a supplementary function of relieving heavy demand on franchised bus and GMB during peak houses and filling gaps of passenger demand which cannot be met by the regular public transport services...
I go along with what TD replied which states that preference will be given to GMB over RBS. So there is no problem to have two Green Bus lines. But during peak hours GMB service could not cater our need and there is a need to have other means of supplementary transportation to relieve the heavy demand in order to fill the of passenger demand which cannot be met by the Green buses.
conclusion: we are pleased to see the presence of green buses at RC but we need shuttle bus during peak hours if green bus company fails to add buses.作者: Hello Kitty 時間: 2004-9-3 12:10:28
conclusion: we are pleased to see the presence of green buses at RC but we need shuttle bus during peak hours if green bus company fails to add buses.
