藍澄灣業主社群

標題: 環保 [打印本頁]

作者: RamblerVillager 時間: 2004-8-6 05:03:17 標題: 環保

作者: cshenryhk 時間: 2004-8-6 13:07:24

It' better to request 和黄狗主同政府狗官 to live in RC ...
Only open Central Air-Conditioning System and close all windows..

What do they feel??? Do they feel comfort?

It become not only "Not a noise sensitive use" but also "Not air use"

作者: 一座Delta 時間: 2004-8-6 17:26:10 標題: 藍澄灣的發展計劃係違反了環保法例

閣下沒必要一開口便狗狗聲，你對政府和發展商不滿是閣下的事，但請不要將整個藍澄灣的居民帶入漩渦，至少我便不認同閣下的看法，我要求的只是一個平、靚、正的居所，並不是無日無之的斗爭。如果變成又憂千年無米食，又憂無命食千年的生活心態，我想日子是相當不好過。

作者: ac 時間: 2004-8-6 18:30:35

Delta

Will your flat affected by the future road? If your answer is no I think that you are too selfish!

作者: 一座Delta 時間: 2004-8-6 18:40:44 標題: 藍澄灣的發展計劃係違反了環保法例

位如其名，本人的位置正是一座 D 室，本人五月初己入伙，與其說未來發生的事，我反關心停車場在晚上及清晨由貨櫃車發出的噪音。

作者: ac 時間: 2004-8-6 19:51:45

Delta

When you find that the new road is noisy it will be too late for you to do anything. If you think that the current carpark is too noisy please consider what will happen when a main trunk road will build on this carpark and over thousands of trucks go thru this road everyday!

作者: kenykl 時間: 2004-8-6 20:44:25

[quote:76ca519a5d="ac"]Delta

When you find that the new road is noisy it will be too late for you to do anything. If you think that the current carpark is too noisy please consider what will happen when a main trunk road will build on this carpark and over thousands of trucks go thru this road everyday![/quote]

totally agree anything we can do/advise relevant depts to do must rise out before they take action.  I sincerely believe even that EPD said the noise factor is not a "problem" if councillor and residents strike for some sort of noise prevention facilities the gov't will still take our advise IF WE STRIKE TO THE LAST MOMENT.

I am residents of flat C somehow not directly affected by the main road.  However as a member of RC I believe some sort of facilities to block the noise would not only good for residents of Tower 1 but to the whole RC too.

Thus if there is anything I can help I will do it.  Please don't be selfish or silent thx.

作者: unicorn 時間: 2004-8-6 23:12:50

delta?
i found that 1D is almost 對正
好1C少少
do u come from very high floor?
你咁有$我冇野講
但你遲下對正貨櫃車同bus
你就知原來高noise level
會神經衰弱同思覺失調

btw
even the transport is not noisy
對busy road 一定會好大dust
日日抺到手軟
直到永遠

d野好快yellow/white
because the SO2 level is high

作者: RamblerVillager 時間: 2004-8-6 23:14:11

作者: 半伯 時間: 2004-8-6 23:47:36

頂佢地D狗官個肺份報告係1999年評估都話未知有藍澄灣既然今天有變動就要學佢地狗老豆話頭 - "要與時並進" 學院同美景花園有人就起隔音屏唔通藍澄灣唔係比人住? 機符係正門口都話冇得傾不粉之所謂掉佢頂帽. :em13: :em13: :em13:

作者: RamblerVillager 時間: 2004-8-7 02:07:06

作者: patty and jimmy 時間: 2004-8-7 11:56:06 標題: Re: 藍澄灣的發展計劃違反了環保法例

[quote:92226501bb="Rambler Villager"]和黄同環保署用了一個叫鮮風系統 Central Air-Conditioning System 及反光反噪音窗户 Noise Insulation Non-glare Window 使藍澄灣成了"無噪音"的屋邨變成Not a noise sensitive use. 我今天開會後發覺香港已經不再係法治而係人治. 大公司在法律之上.

證據:
新路建成後青衣工業學院的音量為73dBa 已經違反了環保法例上限70dBa. 但青衣工業學院遠離新路110m 藍澄灣遠離新路50m 現在反而話無問題因為有兩樣垃圾裝備所以環保署不犯法. 環保法例寫來有乜用? :?:[/quote]

73 db 即係有幾嘈先

作者: kk-in-hk 時間: 2004-8-7 12:06:10 標題: Re: 藍澄灣的發展計劃違反了環保法例

[quote:9c410cbace="patty&jimmy"]
73 db 即係有幾嘈先[/quote]
上次 cable 詹先驗 rc 對住貨櫃碼頭的燥音就好似係有7xdb.

作者: Patrick Cherry 時間: 2004-8-7 20:04:42

奸細始終都出現啦，　我點到唔信尼條友响ｒｃ住，　就算啦，　試問一個自私自利架人點可以得人專重． :evil: :evil:
不過大家架言行最緊要小心，　如果唔系好易收到ｘ商架律師信．．． :!:

作者: hwho 時間: 2004-8-7 21:39:40

[quote:c273287641="

作者: Patrick Cherry 時間: 2004-8-8 00:06:11

[quote:d15cfd6b95="hwho"][quote:d15cfd6b95="

atrick & Cherry"]奸細始終都出現啦，　我點到唔信尼條友响ｒｃ住，　就算啦，　試問一個自私自利架人點可以得人專重． :evil: :evil:
不過大家架言行最緊要小心，　如果唔系好易收到ｘ商架律師信．．． :!:[/quote]Totally agree. 從Delta先生的文章來看，我怎樣也不相信他是rc業主。[/quote]

佢由此至終都系回應個三次睇佢就多 who and i 單嘢可能佢有分攪嘢無論怎樣大家小心d啦唔好比人捉倒痛腳我覺得個天好公平惡人自有惡人磨.... :em10:

作者: dracula 時間: 2004-8-8 00:35:35

[quote:a1a017b698="

atrick & Cherry"]奸細始終都出現啦，　我點到唔信尼條友响ｒｃ住，　就算啦，　試問一個自私自利架人點可以得人專重． :evil:  :evil:
不過大家架言行最緊要小心，　如果唔系好易收到ｘ商架律師信．．． :!:[/quote]

收咪收~  :evil:
用埋 d 咁o既狗招~ 唔理邊個係二五總之佢就... 乜乜啦~  :mrgreen:

歡迎光臨藍澄灣業主社群 (http://rcrest.bzone.com.hk/Discuz/)