paul y 食蕉啦~ 垃圾公司冇鬼用 最大問題係佢老細定o既公司策略...
唔理小業主....只係要搵錢... 廢柴老細唔理乜o野叫社會責任 亦唔知乜o野叫涼心 唔叫佢老細食蕉都唔得
(對唔住咁多位業主 我粗人講o野係粗 d)作者: Tako and Sukie 時間: 2004-5-8 23:24:31
To Joseph I agree to your suggestion. But.. i hope that it's the final solutions. Our target is to solve problems right? My suggestion is that:
1. Complain to Management Group (管理處)
2. Complain to Hutchison Whampoa / Cheung Kong
3. Complain to 消費者委員會 and Media作者: John and Esther 時間: 2004-5-8 23:32:00
[quote:33baccaa39="我是誰"]To Joseph I agree to your suggestion. But.. i hope that it's the final solutions. Our target is to solve problems right? My suggestion is that:
1. Complain to Management Group (管理處)
2. Complain to Hutchison Whampoa / Cheung Kong
3. Complain to 消費者委員會 and Media[/quote]
How to complain Hutachison Whampoa /Cheung Kong? They had already received the money! They don't care of us.作者: JNA 時間: 2004-5-9 00:05:00
[quote:9ac8560de0="John & Esther"]
How to complain Hutachison Whampoa /Cheung Kong? They had already received the money! They don't care of us.[/quote]
no i think mr lam is just a staff of hutachison whampoa and no right to make any decision. he said he'll follow-up all of our problems as if he can. i think he just makes us feel better. how to solve our problems in a short time by his effort only? yes he is so helpful actually. but he is just a one of staff only. Now hutachison whampoa repairs our defects and not seems to be rejected us. so........i think we can't complain them anyway. the main problem is the steps of follow-up. no any professional checking after repair our defects.
so....please still keep our power together!!!! don't give up!!!!!!!!!!作者: CJ 時間: 2004-5-9 00:09:34
I agree with 我是誰's idea we should have strategy to escalate the issues according to this sequence 1->2->3. Media is the last resort.
As long as CK has further houses to sale they should be clever enough to listen to us. Otherwise the noises would severely affect their sale result.
One suggestion is to monitor when they are going to promote big estate (like Pacifica phrase II) and we give warning to them 1-2 weeks before...作者: Joseph 時間: 2004-5-9 00:40:50
好
大家都有個目標作者: diedsee 時間: 2004-5-9 00:54:31
I support to 我是誰's idea although I think the quality ....for me.....is satisfied作者: Qoo 時間: 2004-5-9 19:39:47
[quote:4a7f5fe378="diedsee"]I support to 我是誰's idea although I think the quality ....for me.....is satisfied[/quote]
as discuss with some RC members how many days should we give Mr Lam (management group) for improve defect after last sat meeting? for me i suggest give them 7 days and then review their working (better than before meeting or not).... :em14: